Hello,

Which do you think would be better?

worth more money reed valeve, it will be better?

 

 

less jinks, more tours

 

the 1.5mm gasket, where to put? base or head?

 

what to expect HP/torques?

 

1.

Malossi 166

60mm crankshaft

MRP reed valve box and PE28 Keinhin carburator

PM Evo exhaust

Flywheel original

 

2.

Malossi 166

60mm crankshaft

Pinasco SI2626 carburatore

PM Evo exhaust

Flywheel original

 

best regards 

Szasza

 

I think with an PM you´ll better coose Nr.1

the 1.5mm gasket on base

Bearbeitet 28. Februar 201412 Jr. von scholle

On a 166cc Malossi with a 60mm stroke crankshaft always use a 1,5mm base gasket, especially when used with a performance exhaust:

 

 

Comparsion: 

RED:Head spacer 1,5mm

BLUE: Base spacer 1,5mm

 

 

Warum nicht ganz klassisch Steuerzeiten messen und dann exates Maß unter oder überlegen?

Bearbeitet 28. Februar 201412 Jr. von Mr.Schmidt

1.

Malossi 166

60mm crankshaft

MRP reed valve box and PE28 Keinhin carburator

PM Evo exhaust

Flywheel original

 

2.

Malossi 166

60mm crankshaft

Pinasco SI2626 carburatore

PM Evo exhaust

Flywheel original

 

 

3. Why not?

 

Malossi 166

60mm crankshaft

MRP reed valve box "Drehschieberansaugstutzen" and PE28 Keinhin carburator

PM Evo exhaust

Flywheel original

Thax everyone

 

3.

Yes, we need to think about this

 

How much difference can PE28 vs. Pinasco SI26/26

Which can be easily adjusted

 

best regards

Szasza